Volume electron microscopy for neuronal circuit reconstruction.

By Kevin L. Briggman, Davi D. Bock. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2012

356 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The last decade has seen a rapid increase in the number of tools to acquire volume electron microscopy (EM) data. Several new scanning EM (SEM) imaging methods have emerged, and classical transmission EM (TEM) methods are being scaled up and automated. Here we summarize the new methods for acquiring large EM volumes, and discuss the tradeoffs in terms of resolution, acquisition speed, and reliability. We then assess each method's applicability to the problem of reconstructing anatomical connectivity between neurons, considering both the current capabilities and future prospects of the method. Finally, we argue that neuronal 'wiring diagrams' are likely necessary, but not sufficient, to understand the operation of most neuronal circuits: volume EM imaging will likely find its best application in combination with other methods in neuroscience, such as molecular biology, optogenetics, and physiology.

Subfields: Biophysics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Structural Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/989ede2d7923c453cb77ecae30fb56d6b53ba16b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biophysics

  1. Johannes E. Schindelin
  2. Moritz Helmstaedter
  3. Pavel Tomancak
  4. Albert Cardona
  5. Stephan Saalfeld
  6. Viren Jain
  7. Shuiwang Ji
  8. Stephan Preibisch

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Moritz Helmstaedter
  2. Eve Marder
  3. H. Sebastian Seung
  4. Rodney J. Douglas
  5. György Buzsáki
  6. Xiao-Jing Wang
  7. Yoshua Bengio
  8. Razvan V. Florian

In Structural Biology

  1. Moritz Helmstaedter
  2. Eve Marder
  3. Johannes E. Schindelin
  4. Viren Jain
  5. H. Sebastian Seung
  6. Stephan Saalfeld
  7. Srinivas C. Turaga
  8. Shuiwang Ji

Citations in the corpus