Who cares about human rights

By S. McFarland, Melissa A. Mathews. 2005

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9884cf9cd0a22051ae578347d635041ca8675e21

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Political Conservatism, Need for Cognitive Closure, and Intergroup Hostility (2010, background): “As mentioned above, a liberal worldview is related to egalitarianism, support for civic rights and liberties and rejection of war (Basabe & Valencia, 2007; McFarland & Mathews, 2005).”
Effects of Right‐Wing Authoritarianism and Threat from Terrorism on Restriction of Civil Liberties (2005, methodology): “The present study examined whether RWA is a predictor of support for surveillance measures and restriction of civil liberties, as informed by related findings (e.g., Altemeyer, 1996; McFarland & Mathews, 2005 ).”
Social Dominance Theory: Explorations in the Psychology of Oppression (2016, unknown): “…Federico, Weber, Ergun, & Hunt, 2013 Ferreira, Fisher, Porto, Pilati, & Milfont, 2012 Kugler, Jost,, & Noorbaloochi, 2014 Jackson & Gaertner, 2010 McFarland & Mathews, 2005 Milojev et al., 2014 Passini & Villano, 2013 Rios, Finkelstein, & Landa, 2014 Son Hing, Bobocel, Zanna, & McBride,…”
Political Psychology in International Relations: Beyond the Paradigms (2018, background): “, international institutions, international organizations, international law, foreign direct investment, foreign aid, international development, finance and monetary policy, and global governance—were traditionally situated in the study of international organizations and IPE, suggesting that more ps”
Identification With All Humanity as a Moral Concept and Psychological Construct (2013, background): “…about global issues (e.g., global warming), concern about humanitarian needs, and support for universal human rights on measures developed by McFarland and Mathews (2005), including a willingness to invest national resources and to send troops to defend people around the world in situations…”
Determinants of Human Rights Attitudes and Behavior: A Comparison and Integration of Psychological Perspectives (2007, methodology): “Irrespective of the content of human rights, McFarland and Mathews (2005) differentiate three psychological dimensions of human rights attitudes: endorse ment (general support for human rights), restriction (support for human rights restrictions under conditions of crisis), and commitment (preferenc”
Conservative Ideology and Ambivalent Sexism (2006, background): “Indeed, a recent investigation (McFarland & Mathews, 2005) found that among an American sample, SDO was negatively related to a willingness to use military force to end a variety of human rights abuses around the world.”