Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance

By Tefko Saracevic. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2007

377 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Methods for Evaluating Interactive Information Retrieval Systems with Users (2009, background): “We know from studies that have attempted to define relevance that there are many interpretations of this term, as well as many manifestations [235, 236].”
Information Retrieval Evaluation (2011, background): “A recent set of papers by him [153, 154] not only reviewed his work but surveyed other past work in relevance, both in the theoretical sense (the first paper), and in a review of the user studies (second paper).”
On Fine-Grained Relevance Scales (2018, background): “Relevance is a central concept in IR [18] evaluation; IR systems are usually evaluated using test collections, which are composed of (i) a collection of documents, (ii) a set of queries (called topics), and (iii) a set of relevance assessment for each (topic, document) pair in a pooled set of…”