Effect of Enhanced Nutrition on Mule Deer Population Rate of Change

By C. Bishop, G. White, D. J. Freddy, B. Watkins, T. Stephenson. 2009

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/986fb60d3afd5d3ebcdffb76e4988f6cf382c31f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. R. Terry Bowyer
2. J. Kie
3. Ryan A. Long
4. K. Monteith
5. B. Pierce
6. V. Bleich
7. Mark Hebblewhite
8. Mark A. Hurley

Citations in the corpus

• Still walking on the wild side? Management actions as steps towards 'semi-domestication' of hunted ungulates (2010, background): “Evidence from North America on white-tailed deer (Lewis & Rongstad 1998) and mule deer Odocoileus hemionus Rafinesque (Bishop et al. 2009) also implies that feeding has an effect on performance and thereby is likely to affect selection.”
• A review of the population dynamics of mule deer and black‐tailed deer Odocoileus hemionus in North America (2013, background): “…et al. 1992a CO Plateau 0.86 NR NR NR NR Bender et al. 2007 CO Plateau 0.81 13 61 9 17 Bishop et al. 2005 Intermountain West 0.81 23 7 36 34 Bishop et al. 2009 CO Plateau 0.91 (S) 35 16 35 16 Bleich & Taylor 1998 Intermountain West 0.75 63 9 4 24 Bleich et al. 2006 Intermountain West and…”
• Predation by coyotes on white‐tailed deer neonates in South Carolina (2012, methodology): “Conversely, evidence from studies of mule deer (O. hemionus) in Colorado has shown that coyote predation on neonates is compensatory to mortality from winter stress and malnutrition (Bartmann et al. 1992, Bishop et al. 2009).”
• Effects of Predator Treatments, Individual Traits, and Environment on Moose Survival in Alaska (2011, background): “However, winter coyote (Canis latrans) predation on mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) fawns can have a large compensatory component (Bartmann et al. 1992; Bishop et al. 2005, 2009).”
• Habitat selection by mule deer during migration: effects of landscape structure and natural-gas development (2012, background): “…of mule deer have declined throughout much of the Intermountain West, USA (Unsworth et al. 1999, Johnson et al. 2000, Stewart et al. 2002, Bishop et al. 2009, Hurley et al. 2011), and unprecedented levels of energy development throughout the region represent a critical threat to…”
• Can Coyotes Affect Deer Populations in Southeastern North America? (2010, background): “Although in some situations coyote predation on fawns is compensatory to other mortality factors (Bartmann et al. 1992, Bishop et al. 2009), it also has been shown to be additive, and therefore limiting, in other situations (Messier et al. 1986, Patterson et al. 2002).”
• Life-History Characteristics of Mule Deer: Effects of Nutrition in a Variable Environment (2014, methodology): “Given high and consistent rates of pregnancy and fecundity (Andelt et al. 2004, Bishop et al. 2009), however, reduced survival of neonates during their first year-of-life is the most likely explanation for population declines (Gill et al. 2001, Andelt et al. 2004, Wasley 2004).”
• White‐tailed deer population dynamics and adult female survival in the presence of a novel predator (2015, background): “Coyote predation on neonates may be compensatory to other mortality factors (Bartmann et al. 1992, Bishop et al. 2009), or additive (and therefore limiting; Messier et al. 1986, Patterson et al. 2002), but most research related to coyote impacts on deer has been conducted either in the historical…”
• Demographic Response of Mule Deer to Experimental Reduction of Coyotes and Mountain Lions in Southeastern Idaho (2011, result): “Fawn-at-heel ratios were also higher than most fetal rates reported in a comprehensive review by Anderson (1981) and similar to recent work (Bishop et al. 2009).”