Still walking on the wild side? Management actions as steps towards 'semi-domestication' of hunted ungulates

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

To feed or not to feed? Evidence of the intended and unintended effects of feeding wild ungulates (2014, background): “…on one’s perspective, feeding, together with selective harvesting, fencing, and predator control, may be viewed as either an obligation of hunters in their role as guardians of wildlife, or as steps towards the domestication of ungulates (Brown and Cooper 2006, Mysterud 2010, Schmidt 2014).”
Conspecifics can be aliens too: A review of effects of restocking practices in vertebrates (2012, background): “002 arn more when populations are dense (Mysterud 2010).”
Ecological and evolutionary implications of food subsidies from humans. (2013, background): “PAFS provided to ungulates to increase hunting rates moved wild evolutionary traits closer to those associated to a semi-domestic state affecting both natural and sexual selection (Mysterud 2010).”