Innovation Complementarity and Scale of Production

By Eugenio J. Miravete, J. C. Pernias. 2006

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98554e5cd3c4dda0fa35c39f0a5dfdf8c2859285

Citations in the corpus

• Testing for Complementarity: Glyphosate Tolerant Soybeans and Conservation Tillage (2015, unknown): “For example, Miravete and Pernías (2006) used a version of the multinomial probit model to test for complementarity among production and innovation strategies, and Gentkow (2007) used a mixed logit model to test for complementarity between print and online newspapers.”
• Using Innovation Surveys for Econometric Analysis (2010, unknown): “Firms tend to innovate in both products and processes (Cabagnols and Le Bas, 2002; Martı́nez-Ros and Labeaga, 2002; Miravete and Pernı́as, 2006), although this complementarity may be specific to certain sectors of the economy.”
• The impact of R&D offshoring on the home knowledge production of OECD investing regions (2012, unknown): “We test the null hypothesis of independent pairs of decision variables (Miravete and Pernias, 2006).”
• Innovation strategies, process and product innovations and growth: Firm-level evidence from Brazil (2012, unknown): “This is suggestive of complementarity between product and process innovations (see also Miravete and Pernias (2006) for evidence on complementarity for developed countries).”
• R&D, worker training and innovation: firm-level evidence (2016, unknown): “This theory has been applied in papers that look for complementarities among di erent business strategies (e.g., Arora and Gambardella, 1990; Bresnahan et al., 2002; Mohnen and Röller, 2005; Miravete and Pernias, 2006; Cassiman and Veugelers, 2006).”