Distinguishing One’s Own Voice from Those of Others: A Function for Private Speech?

By Charles Fernyhough, James Russell. 1997

Subfields: Cognitive Science & Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Science & Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015, neutral): “…(Atencio & Montero, 2009; Day & Smith, 2013), planning for communicative interaction (San Martin, Montero, Navarro, & Biglia, 2014), theory of mind (Fernyhough & Meins, 2009), self-discrimination (Fernyhough & Russell, 1997), fantasy (Olszewski, 1987), and creativity (White & Daugherty, 2009).”
Individual differences in children's private speech: the role of imaginary companions. (2013, unknown): “Y license.”
Private speech on an executive task: relations with task difficulty and task performance (2005, background): “Utterances were then classified as social or private according to the following objective criteria (C, child, E, experimenter; Fernyhough & Russell, 1997; adapted fromDiaz, 1992; Furrow, 1992; Goudena, 1992).”
The discursive nature of inner speech (2012, background): “…(1934/1999) works on egocentric speech, there have been many empirical studies on private speech and self-regulation (Fernyhough & Fradley, 2005; Fernyhough & Russell, 1997; Goudena, 1987; Luria, 1982; Rommetveit & Blakar, 1979; Wertsch & Stone, 1985), neurological correlates (Ehrich, 2006;…”
Getting Vygotskian about theory of mind: Mediation, dialogue, and the development of social understanding (2008, unknown): “Specifically, an assimilation of the Bakhtinian concepts of voice and dialogue can provide a powerful extension of Vygotsky‘s theory, capable of speaking to some of the issues of most concern to modern developmental psychologists (Fernyhough, 1996; 1997; Fernyhough & Russell, 1997).”