Systematic approaches to a successful literature review

By F. Pearson. 2014

411 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A systematic review of Lean Six Sigma for the manufacturing industry (2015, background): “2 Criteria Inclusion and exclusion criteria are stated in order to make it clear to the reader why some articles with which they are familiar have been excluded from the review (Booth et al., 2012).”
Co-creating services—conceptual clarification, forms and outcomes (2018, methodology): “To ensure an appropriate structure and objectivity in the selection of literature, the focused literature review followed the four consecutive stages proposed by Booth et al. (2016): literature search, appraise the evidence base, analyze the findings and synthesize the results.”