International Trade and Income Differences

By Michael E. Waugh. 2010

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9827bc5c4b46d855ba329e440944d9871b5921df

Citations in the corpus

• The Evolution of Comparative Advantage: Measurement and Welfare Implications (2011, unknown): “Following the arguments in Waugh (2009), we include an exporter fixed effect exji .”
• Robots, Tasks and Trade (2018, unknown): “…globalization for welfare and income distribution, including influential contributions by Yi (2003), Dekle, Eaton, and Kortum (2008), Chor (2010), Waugh (2010), Fieler (2011), Arkolakis, Costinot, and Rodriguez-Clare (2012), Ramondo and Rodriguez-Clare (2013), Caliendo and Parro (2015),…”
• Trade, Multinational Production, and the Gains from Openness (2013, unknown): “…it to incorporate MP. 11 According to the BEA, total income earned by US multinationals from their foreign affiliates amounted to $325 billion in 2009, whereas in that same year, US income via royalties and license fees from unaffiliated foreign sources amounted to a comparatively low $31 billion.”
• The Impact of Regional and Sectoral Productivity Changes on the U.S. Economy (2014, unknown): “18 Consistent with evidence from Waugh (2010) based on price data, we further control for exporter fixed effects, ηn.”
• Trade Costs in the Developing World: 1996–2010 (2015, unknown): “Results are comparable in a qualitative sense to those obtained by Waugh (2010), who uses an approach based on Eaton and Kortum (2002) to develop an inferred measure of trade costs in developed and developing countries.”
• Firm entry, trade, and welfare in Zipf's world (2013, unknown): “firms follows Zipf’s Law. Similar findings obtain in the case European countries (Fujiwara, Aoyama, Di Guilmi, Souma and Gallegati 2004) and Japan (Okuyama, Takayasu and Takayasu 1999). Other phenomena known to follow Zipf’s Law include city size, income and wealth, and CEO compensation. (2)Exceptio”
• Quantitative Spatial Economics (2017, unknown): “Second, we set the elasticity of substitution (σ ) equal to 5, which implies an elasticity of trade flows with respect to trade costs of σ − 1 = 4, in line with the estimates of Simonovska & Waugh (2014). Third, we assume that trade costs are a constant elasticity function of effective distance (dni”
• Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA (2012, unknown): “More recent studies are Burstein, Cravino, and Vogel (2013), Burstein and Vogel (2012), Caselli, Koren, Lisicky, and Tenreyro (2012), Fieler (2011), Kerr (2009), Levchenko and Zhang (2011), Parro (2013), Ossa (2012), Ramondo and Rodriguez-Clare (2013), and Waugh (2010).”