Quantitative Spatial Economics

464 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Monopsony in Labor Markets: A Review (2020, background): “…market concentration, many studies use manufacturing only when one can argue that the market is national rather than local (though most economic geography models include trade costs that increase with distance so that all markets are local to some extent: see Redding and Rossi-Hansberg 2017).”
The Economic Geography of Global Warming (2021, background): “See Redding and Rossi-Hansberg (2017) for a survey of this literature.”
Place-Based Policies and Spatial Disparities across European Cities (2020, unknown): “More recent spatial economic models eliminate the possibility of multiple-equilibrium but more easily incorporate realistic multi-region geography (Allen and Arkolakis 2014; Redding and Rossi-Hansberg 2017).”
Optimal Spatial Policies, Geography, and Sorting* (2018, unknown): “implications of regional shocks such as infrastructure investments and regional productivity changes, summarized by Redding and Rossi-Hansberg (2017).20 However, their normative implications have barely been explored.”