Oil futures: A comparison of global supply forecasts

By S. Sorrell, Richard G. Miller, R. Bentley, Jamie Speirs. 2010

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper compares and evaluates fourteen contemporary forecasts of global supply of conventional oil and provides some observations on their relative plausibility. Despite the wide range of modelling approaches used and multiplicity of assumptions made, it is shown that forecasts can be usefully compared along two dimensions, namely: shape of future production profile and assumed or implied ultimately recoverable resource of conventional oil. Other differences between forecasts are either secondary or are components of these two parameters. The paper shows how large differences in the assumed size of the resource make relatively little difference to the timing of a global peak in conventional oil production. It also examines the impact of rates of discovery, reserves growth and depletion on the forecast date of peak and shows how forecasts that delay this peak until beyond 2030 rest on assumptions that are at best optimistic and at worst implausible.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97ec3796299e902cb6f71e1c015418945e6c9933

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Dominik Wiedenhofer
  2. J. Steinberger
  3. Michael Kumhof
  4. Manfred Lenzen
  5. Jaromı́r Beneš
  6. O. Kamenik
  7. Susanna Mursula
  8. Jack Selody

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

  1. J. Steinberger
  2. Dominik Wiedenhofer
  3. M. Höök
  4. Xu Tang
  5. O. Kamenik
  6. Susanna Mursula
  7. Jack Selody
  8. D. Laxton

Citations in the corpus