Agglomeration Economies and Location Choice: Foreign Direct Investment in Hungary

By F. Boudier. 2005

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The FDI location decision: Distance and the effects of spatial dependence (2014, unknown): “Hungary Boudier-Bensebaa (2005)”
The Location Choice of Foreign Direct Investments: Empirical Evidence and Methodological Challenges (2017, background): “…(2002), Belderbos et al. (2011), Bellak et al. (2008), Bevan and Estrin (2004), Bevan et al. (2004), Bhardwaj et al. (2007), Blonigen et al. (2007), Boudier-Bensebaa (2005), Carstensen and Toubal (2004), Casper and Whitley (2004), Cassidy and AndreossoO’Callaghan (2006), Chan et al. (2006), Cheng…”
Economic institutions and FDI location choice: Evidence from US multinationals in China (2008, background): “…FDI from data of other countries, such as Portugal by Guimaraes, Figueiredo and Woodward (2000), France by Crozet, Mayer and Mucchielli (2004), and Hungury by Boudier-Bensebaa (2005). they are ethnically Chinese economies, and FDI from these two regions may not be representative of FDI in general.”
Do low corporate income tax rates attract FDI? – Evidence from Central- and East European countries (2009, background): “For example, Boudier-Bensebaa (2005) reported that, in Hungary, special tax incentives for MNEs have increasingly been phased out, or that domestic and foreign firms are now treated equally.”