Climate change effects on species interactions in an alpine plant community
By K. Klanderud. 2005
200 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97ad9b60c579e86a1f7dc6a015520832357b03f7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- F. Pugnaire
- Fernando T. Maestre
- R. Callaway
- Richard Michalet
- Christopher J. Lortie
- C. Armas
- L. Cavieres
- P. Liancourt
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- F. Pugnaire
- Fernando T. Maestre
- R. Callaway
- Richard Michalet
- Christopher J. Lortie
- L. Cavieres
- C. Armas
- Rob W. Brooker
In Plant Science
- F. Pugnaire
- R. Callaway
- Fernando T. Maestre
- Richard Michalet
- L. Cavieres
- Christopher J. Lortie
- C. Armas
- Rob W. Brooker
Citations in the corpus
- SIMULATED CLIMATE CHANGE ALTERED DOMINANCE HIERARCHIES AND DIVERSITY OF AN ALPINE BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT (2005, background): “…may be a key species with both negative and positive impacts on ecosystem carbon gain (Welker et al. 1997), population dynamics of other species (Klanderud 2005), community diversity (Klanderud and Totland 2004), and establishment of other species (Dryas drummondii Richard; Chapin et al. 1994).”
- Forecasting plant community impacts of climate variability and change: when do competitive interactions matter? (2012, background): “While some experimental studies have shown that climate change could alter per capita interaction effects among plant species (Klanderud 2005; Saccone et al. 2009), others have failed to show that climate variability influences interaction coefficients (Greenlee & Callaway 1996; Tielborger & Kadmon…”
- Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future (2007, background): “Based on the original SGH, some authors have predicted a general shift in species interactions from more strongly positive to more strongly negative as these environments warm (e.g. Klanderud & Totland 2005; Klanderud 2005).”
- Weak and variable relationships between environmental severity and small‐scale co‐occurrence in alpine plant communities (2007, background): “Indeed, non-random co-occurrence indicative of facilitative relationships in high-mountain environments has mostly been reported between species of different growth forms (Carlsson & Callaghan 1991; Cavieres et al. 2002; Kalin-Arroyo et al. 2003; Klanderud 2005).”
- Plant guilds drive biomass response to global warming and water availability in subalpine grassland (2006, background): “affect responses to climate change in alpine species (Klanderud 2005).”
- The relative importance of neighbours and abiotic environmental conditions for population dynamic parameters of two alpine plant species (2005, background): “We predict that removal of the whole neighbour vegetation may have greater effect on the target species than removal of only Dryas (Klanderud 2005), because numerous species and functional groups in concert are likely to utilize the available resources more completely (e.”
- Warming changes plant competitive hierarchy in a temperate steppe in northern China (2008, background): “For example, climate warming modifies the effect of species removal in an alpine community (Klanderud 2005) but not in an Arctic tundra (Hobbie et al.”
- Ecosystem properties determined by plant functional group identity (2010, result): “Removal experiments reported mixed results for interactions between removal treatments and environmental conditions, with many (Shevtsova, Haukioja & Ojala 1997; Klanderud 2005; Wardle, Lagerstrom & Nilsson 2008) but not all (Hobbie, Shevtsova & Chapin 1999) showing interactive effects.”
- Shrub expansion in tundra ecosystems: dynamics, impacts and research priorities (2011, background): “Although growth of tundra plants is limited by temperature in Arctic and alpine environments [52, 53], many other factors influence shrub growth (figure 3).”
- Partitioning net interactions among plants along altitudinal gradients to study community responses to climate change (2014, background): “…the boreal (i.e. mesic climates) most warming studies have supported the general predictions of the SGH, finding either an increase in competition (Klanderud 2005; Klanderud & Totland 2005), or a shift from facilitative to negative interactions with warming (Shetsova, Haukioja & Ojala 1997; Rixen…”
- Species-specific responses of an alpine plant community under simulated environmental change (2008, background): “Previous removal experiments in the Dryas heath at Finse have demonstrated competitive effects of neighbours on selected low stature species (Thalictrum alpinum, Carex vaginata; Klanderud 2005; Klanderud & Totland 2005b).”