The relative importance of neighbours and abiotic environmental conditions for population dynamic parameters of two alpine plant species

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Partitioning net interactions among plants along altitudinal gradients to study community responses to climate change (2014, background): “…mesic climates) most warming studies have supported the general predictions of the SGH, finding either an increase in competition (Klanderud 2005; Klanderud & Totland 2005), or a shift from facilitative to negative interactions with warming (Shetsova, Haukioja & Ojala 1997; Rixen & Mulder 2009),…”
Species-specific responses of an alpine plant community under simulated environmental change (2008, background): “The decrease of cryptogam abundance under environmental change simulations appears to be consistent across alpine (Klanderud & Totland 2005a; van der Wal et al. 2005) and arctic (e.g. Chapin et al. 1995; Molau & Alatalo 1998; Cornelissen et al. 2001; Hollister et al. 2005b; Jónsdóttir et al. 2005;…”
Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future (2007, background): “Based on the original SGH, some authors have predicted a general shift in species interactions from more strongly positive to more strongly negative as these environments warm (e.g. Klanderud & Totland 2005; Klanderud 2005).”