Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Frequency-Based Accounts

By Martin J. Pickering, Matthew J. Traxler, Matthew W. Crocker. 2000

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/976270fe0072425068d2906ac61d133965f19308

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Florent Perek
2. Roger P. G. van Gompel
3. Martin J. Pickering
4. Matthew J. Traxler
5. Giosuè Baggio

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Martin J. Pickering
2. Roger P. G. van Gompel
3. Florent Perek
4. Matthew J. Traxler
5. Giosuè Baggio
6. Keith Rayner
7. Simon Garrod
8. Robert J. Hartsuiker

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Roger P. G. van Gompel
2. Martin J. Pickering
3. Florent Perek
4. Matthew J. Traxler
5. Giosuè Baggio
6. Keith Rayner
7. Robert J. Hartsuiker
8. Edward Gibson

Citations in the corpus

• Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives (2015, background): “Note that the case of optionally transitive verbs examined by Clifton et al. (1984) and Pickering et al. (2000) is more in line with the hypothesis, since it involves one-participant vs. two-participant construals of the same semantic frame.”
• Reanalysis in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Current Constraint-Based and Two-Stage Models (2001, result): “…with the sauce that was tough didn’t win a pri, in accord with pretest data and with Gilboy et (1995); but this difficulty first emerged on firs pass regressions from the postcritical reg after the critical word tough(see also Pickerin & Traxler, 1998; Pickering et al., 2000, for sim ilar effects).”