Reanalysis in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Current Constraint-Based and Two-Stage Models

By Roger P. G. van Gompel, Martin J. Pickering, Matthew J. Traxler. 2001

174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92dee9ce457c88c323bb3ca9d82fa08aee7acd8e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Shravan Vasishth
2. Roger Levy
3. Edward Gibson
4. Titus von der Malsburg
5. Jamie Pearson
6. E. Chen
7. Florian Wolf
8. D. Mitchell

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Roger Levy
2. Jamie Pearson
3. Edward Gibson
4. Shravan Vasishth
5. E. Chen
6. Florian Wolf
7. Simon P. Liversedge
8. Roger P. G. van Gompel

In Language and Linguistics

1. Roger Levy
2. Shravan Vasishth
3. Jamie Pearson
4. D. Mitchell
5. X. Shen
6. Matthew J. Green
7. T. Hodgson
8. Edward Gibson

Citations in the corpus

• Accounting for regressive eye-movements in models of sentence processing: A reappraisal of the Selective Reanalysis hypothesis (2008, background): “Van Dyke, J., & Lewis, R. L. (2003).”
• Scanpaths reveal syntactic underspecification and reanalysis strategies (2012, result): “However, the observed difference (the ambiguity advantage) is established in the literature and has been reported by several studies (Traxler et al., 1998; Swets et al., 2008; van Gompel et al., 2001; van Gompel, Pickering, Pearson, & Liversedge, 2005; Traxler, 2007).”
• Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. (2008, background): “…NP/VP attachment ambiguities, and by van Gompel et al. (2005) for NPs postmodified by progressive participial VPs. Traxler et al. (1998); van Gompel et al. (2001, 2005) have argued that these reading patterns are problematic for parallel competition-based accounts, according to which an…”
• Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush (2006, background): “Apart from animacy, there is another factor that must be taken into consideration when studying relative clause processing: Since the relative clause is a statement about the antecedent, the antecedent is the topic of the relative clause (cf. Kuno, 1976; Lambrecht, 1988; Van Valin, 1996).”
• Evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution. (2005, methodology): “An example of a variable-choice model is the unrestricted race model (Traxler et al., 1998; Van Gompel et al., 2001).”
• Online Syntactic Storage Costs in Sentence Comprehension. (2005, result): “... result that there is a cost for retaining the wh-filler expectation, suggests that people are following the SC structure in the temporary ambiguity in the materials in Experiment 2. This result is consistent with gathering evidence that suggests that the human sentence processor is serial in nat”