Numerical approaches towards life cycle interpretation five examples
By Reinout Heijungs, R. Kleijn. 2001
177 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9736a02cfe1e39d533a2b85d37fa6df0036a8f9b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Engineering
- Reinout Heijungs
- André Bardow
- N. Assen
- Johannes Jung
- Jeroen B. Guinée
- Thomas H. Christensen
- Julie Clavreul
- V. Rovers
In Statistics and Probability
- Reinout Heijungs
- Thomas H. Christensen
- Anders Damgaard
- Julie Clavreul
- Hubert Baumeister
- Jeroen B. Guinée
- V. Rovers
- R. Kleijn
Citations in the corpus
- Bias in normalization: Causes, consequences, detection and remedies (2007, methodology): “In our view, internal normalization is an extremely useful step in the context of a comparative analysis (Heijungs & Kleijn 2001) or multicriteria analysis (Seppälä et al. 2001).”
- An environmental assessment system for environmental technologies (2014, methodology): “This analysis, known as “discernibility analysis” (as introduced by Heijungs and Kleijn, 2001), is a crucial step in uncertainty analysis, as several parameters may be used in both scenarios.”
- Sensitivity coefficients for matrix-based LCA (2010, background): “4.2 Perturbation analysis Heijungs and Kleijn (2001) and Sakai and Yokoyama (2002) describe perturbation analysis as a way of investigating which input data are most decisive for the results in terms of their relative sensitivity.”
- Sensitivity coefficient-based uncertainty analysis for multi-functionality in LCA (2014, background): “Heijungs and Kleijn (2001) and Heijungs and Suh (2002, p. 182) suggest integrating parameters such as allocation factors into analytical uncertainty propagation.”
- Interpretation of comparative LCAs: external normalization and a method of mutual differences (2017, background): “We can identify relevant aspects of a comparison with the overlap area between probability distributions or other approaches that evaluate mutual differences (Heijungs and Kleijn 2001; Prado-Lopez et al. 2014; Henriksson et al. 2015; Gregory et al. 2016; Wei et al. 2016).”