Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’

By Dean C. Adams, F. James Rohlf, Dennis E. Slice. 2004

2,239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9728d89377ccff0582cbb22dfd4cf8533f545f3c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geometry and Topology

In Paleontology

Citations in the corpus

Log-Shape Ratios, Procrustes Superimposition, Elliptic Fourier Analysis: Three Worked Examples in R (2013, methodology): “Morphometric methods have undergone an important progression starting from “traditional” or “multivariate” morphometrics to “modern” or “geometric morphometrics” (Rohlf and Marcus, 1993; Adams et al., 2004).”
Evolutionary morphing (2005, background): “Scientists need to be able to define and analyze statistically significant variables expressing biological shape.”
A field comes of age: geometric morphometrics in the 21 st century (2013, background): “We end with a discussion of some possible areas that are fertile ground for future development in the field.”
geomorph: an r package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data (2013, background): “In recent years, the quantitative study of anatomical form has matured into the ﬁeld of mor-phometrics: the study of shape variation and its covariation with other variables (Bookstein 1991; Rohlf & Marcus 1993; Adams, Rohlf & Slice 2004; Zelditch et al. 2004; Adams, Rohlf & Slice 2013).”
CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT VIA AGGRESSIVE INTERFERENCE IN APPALACHIAN SALAMANDERS (2004, methodology): “To quantify head morphology (shape) I used landmark-based geometric morphometric methods (Rohlf and Marcus 1993, Adams et al. 2004).”
Landmark based geometric morphometric analysis of wing shape in Sibiricobombus Vogt (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus Latreille) (2007, methodology): “In general, it is not possible to generate graphical representations of shapes from the linear distances (Adams et al. 2004).”
A geometric morphometric approach to the study of ecogeographical and clinal variation in vervet monkeys (2007, methodology): “Geometric morphometric analyses (Rohlf & Marcus, 1993; Adams et al., 2004) were performed in the following computer programs: Morpheus (Slice, 1999), Morphologika (O’Higgins & Jones, 2006), TPSSmall 1.”
Sample size and sampling error in geometric morphometric studies of size and shape (2007, methodology): “Analyses were performed using geometric morphometrics (Rohlf and Marcus 1993; Adams et al. 2004) in the”
Building Developmental Integration into Functional Systems: Function-Induced Integration of Mandibular Shape (2009, methodology): “…by estimating the tangent to the curve at each semilandmark, then sliding the semi-landmark toward the normal of its respective tangent, minimizing the overall difference from the reference (Sampson et al. 1996; Andresen et al. 2000; Bookstein et al. 2002; Adams et al. 2004; Sheets et al. 2004).”
Geometric morphometrics: recent applications to the study of evolution and development (2010, background): “Geometric morphometrics is often hailed as a ‘revolution’ in morphometrics (e.g., Adams et al. 2004); in some ways the focus on geometic coordinates has been a revolution, but precise delineations of the field from so-called ‘traditional’ morphometrics become murky because a range of techniques…”
Insect morphology in the age of phylogenomics: innovative techniques and its future role in systematics (2014, background): “The developing novel approach was referred to as geometric morphometrics (Adams et al. 2004).”
Plant species identification using digital morphometrics: A review (2012, background): “1) or specific landmarks and the distances between them [32].”