Where Are We Now On Cultural Economics
By M. Blaug. 2001
217 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96dc61b8aeb3746f1c5c1a8c68801d5612b6fb5e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Stephan Meier
- Bruno S. Frey
- R. Burton
- U. H. Paragahawewa
- Alois Stutzer
- Matthias Benz
- Richard A. Easterlin
- Luca Stanca
In Urban Studies
In Visual Arts and Performing Arts
Citations in the corpus
- The Economic Impact of Cultural Events (2006, background): “3 Some of the reference works on the analytic stance of Cultural Economics are Throsby (1994; 2001), Benhamou (1996), Hutter and Rizzo (1997), Towse (1997; 2003), Blaug (2001) and Herrero (2001).”
- The Economics of Museums (2003, background): “It has also been covered in more general surveys [Throsby (1994); Blaug (2001)], in monographs and textbooks [Frey and Pommerehne (1989); Frey (2000); Heilbrun and Gray (2001); Benhamou (2000)] and in readers in the field of cultural economics [Blaug (1976); Peacock and Rizzo (1994); Ginsburgh and…”
- Cultural Industries: Product–Market Characteristics, Management Challenges and Industry Dynamics (2015, unknown): “44 Blaug, M. (2001). Where are we now on cultural economics? Journal of Economic Surveys, 15, pp.”
- Creating culturally sustainable agri-environmental schemes (2011, background): “In addition, the focus in cultural economics is on highbrow capital alonee i.e. it is more an economy of the arts (as noted by Blaug, 2001 and Towse, 2003) than an theory to account for cultural capital alongside economic capital.”
- Discrete Choice Models and Valuation Experiments (2003, unknown): “, who defines “loose neoclassicism” a theory framed over self-interested individual whose actions are constrained by costs, meaning no more that users pursue their own interest, taking into account prices, incomes, but also norms and conventions ( Blaug, 2001”