Regional industrial path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis

By Arne Isaksen, Michaela Trippl. 2014

210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96da8c60a8cf7c02896492d2b7d38bc38680b13c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

The drivers of SME innovation in the regions of the EU (2021, background): “Hence, we posit that innovation policies for SMEs, both at the national and European level, need to become more place-sensitive in order to become more effective at delivering innovation for SMEs (e.g., Tödtling and Trippl, 2005; Asheim et al., 2011; Rodríguez-Pose, 2013; Boschma, 2015; Alberdi et a”
Regional economic resilience in China: measurement and determinants (2021, background): “…developing new goods and services for export and renewing regional economies and for driving path development, new path creation or enabling REGIONAL STUDIES regions to continually branch out of existing specialized industrial sectors to develop more diversified economies (Isaksen & Trippl, 2014).”
Perspectives on Cluster Evolution: Critical Review and Future Research Issues (2015, background): “Recent conceptual work by Boschma (2014) and Isaksen and Trippl (2014) supports this view, demonstrating that regional characteristics such as the degree of diversity of industrial structures and organizational thickness as well as region-specific institutions, the presence of bridging social…”
Exogenous sources of regional industrial change (2018, background): “…creation in peripheral areas, arguing that the absence of a critical mass of strong actors may offer geographical niches for new paths and room for experimentation (Simmie, 2012) and underlining the importance of exogenous stimuli (Varis et al., 2014; Virkkala, 2007; Isaksen and Trippl, 2016b).”
Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency (2018, methodology): “We follow the typology in Isaksen and Trippl (2016) by distinguishing three types of RISs that are supposed to have different potentials for interactive learning, innovation and new path development.”
Exogenously Led and Policy-Supported New Path Development in Peripheral Regions: Analytical and Synthetic Routes (2017, background): “…branching processes (Boschma and Frenken 2011); the combination of different knowledge bases (Manniche 2012); a strong endowment of supporting organizations (Isaksen and Trippl 2014); scientific excellence and a vibrant entrepreneurial culture; and regional knowledge circulation (Feldman 2007).”
Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: a research agenda (2017, unknown): “Isaksen and Trippl (2014) have linked different types of regional innovation systems to the question whether regions are more likely to develop new growth paths, and if so, whether regions focus on new path creation versus path renewal.”
Innovation and regional economic resilience: an exploratory analysis (2018, background): “Technological innovation is regarded as critical in enabling regions to continually branch out of existing specialized industrial sectors and developmore diversified economies (Simmie andMartin 2010; Isaksen and Trippl 2014).”
The dark side of regional industrial path development: towards a typology of trajectories of decline (2019, background): “Isaksen and Trippl (2016) distinguish between organizationally thick and diversified systems, organizationally thick and specialized systems and organizationally thin systems.”
Regional innovation policies for new path development – beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views (2018, background): “Isaksen and Trippl (2016) and Trippl et al. (2017) suggest that regions vary in their preconditions and capacities to develop new industrial paths due to pronounced differences in endogenous potentials and different abilities to attract and absorb exogenous resources: Metropo-litan regions are seen…”
Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development (2019, background): “In the present paper, we follow Isaksen and Trippl (2016) and others and use the notion of ‘new path development’ as an umbrella term for various forms of the rise of new economic activities in regions.”