3 Goal-Directed and Stimulus-Driven Determinants of Attentional Control
By Steven Yantis. 2000
290 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9652c20f1e67eaf367c8190973dec83f31aa8cee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Sophie Forster
- Nilli Lavie
- Joy J. Geng
- Steven B. Most
- Charles Spence
- Sonia J. Bishop
- Christian Frings
- S. Fletcher‐Watson
Citations in the corpus
- Visual attention: The past 25 years (2011, unknown): “…selectively deployed to visual features, such as particular orientations, colors or directions of motion, regardless of their locations (e.g., Boynton, 2009; Haenny, Maunsell, & Schiller, 1988; Martinez-Trujillo & Treue, 2004; Maunsell & Treue, 2006; Treue & Martinez-Trujillo, 1999; Yantis, 2000).”
- Attentional capture by entirely irrelevant distractors (2008, background): “…indicating that the singleton effects in these tasks are modulated by the extent to which the singleton feature is in fact relevant to the attentional settings (for review see Yantis, 2000)*indeed in some cases no attentional capture effects have been found for irrelevant singleton features.”
- Parietal cortex and attention. (2004, background): “Both goal-directed and stimulus-driven mechanisms have ecological significance such that, under certain circumstances, attention in one or the other fashion has adaptive value [4], and several recent papers suggest that these two attentional biasing mechanisms map onto distinct loci within the parie”
- What speakers do and what addressees look at: visual attention to gestures in human interaction live and on video (2006, unknown): “This, in turn, may reflect an 'attentional control setting' (Folk and Remington 1998; Yantis 2000) to attend to the face as the main source of information, especially of linguistic information relevant to speech perception (Vatikiotis-Bateson, Eigsti, Yano and Munhall 1998).”
- Cognitive control and counterproductive oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli (2015, background): “However, the role of top-down selection strategies in singleton capture is a contentious issue (Folk & Remington, 1998; Theeuwes, 1994; Yantis, 2000).”