Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level - and effective?

By J. Newig, O. Fritsch. 2009

922 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9639d9d605592000c703189b9495f2f7b3e8c421

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Christopher M. Raymond
2. Arthur P. J. Mol
3. Rachel Curzon
4. M. Reed
5. I. Fazey
6. Genia Kostka
7. Bradley D. Parrish
8. J. Kenter

In Global and Planetary Change

1. M. Reed
2. Christopher M. Raymond
3. Arthur P. J. Mol
4. J. Fischer
5. Rachel Curzon
6. J. Newig
7. G. Cundill
8. I. Fazey

In Public Administration

1. Arthur P. J. Mol

Citations in the corpus

• Integrating rural development and biodiversity conservation in Central Romania (2013, background): “Unlike in the past, a wide range of new actors now influence how policy and legislation is implemented on the ground (Fairbrass & Jordan 2001; Grabbe 2001; Newig & Fritsch 2009; Börzel & Buzogány 2010).”
• Stakeholder mapping for the governance of biosecurity: a literature review (2015, background): “Similarly, Newig and Fritsch (2009) found that the composition of groups engaging in participatory processes and their associated preferences strongly influenced the environmental standard of outputs.”
• What is social learning (2010, background): “Yet, stakeholder participation, which we define as a process whereby individuals, groups, and/or organizations choose to take an active role in decision making processes that affect them (Reed 2008, Newig and Fritsch 2009), and social learning are very different concepts.”
• Implementation and Participation in China's Local Environmental Politics: Challenges and Innovations (2013, background): “Regardless of the many claims regarding the environmental gains of more participatory policy models and measures, empirical evidence indicating that more participation provides better environmental outcomes is still rather thin (e.g. Bulkeley and Mol, 2003; Newig and Fritsch, 2009).”
• A qualitative meta-synthesis of the benefits of eco-labeling in developing countries (2016, neutral): “…has been commonly applied in healthcare studies (e.g. Finlayson & Dixon, 2008; Walsh & Downe, 2005), social scientists have only recently adopted it to analyze large quantities of qualitative data that may not be amenable to quantitative analysis (e.g. Newig & Fritsch, 2009; Puaschunder, 2012).”