Technological Change, Technological Catch-up, and Capital Deepening: Relative Contributions to Growth and Convergence

By Paul M. Romer, Robert E. Lucas, Charles I. Jones, Oded Galor, D. Quah. 2002

793 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/962b5078a386ca071f35de983ae3a0a234dc95a3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Sources of long-term economic growth for Turkey, 1880–2005 (2008, neutral): “In this section, we examine the impact of sectoral re-allocation 17In this regard, Kumar and Russell (2002) and Maudos, Pastor, and Serrano (2000) construct world production frontiers using output and inputs of labor and capital under the assumption of CRTS.”
Creating Competition? Globalisation and the Emergence of New Technology Producers (2005, methodology): “recent study, using a different methodology by Kumar and Russell (2002). The values of IRI on licensing shares for the pre-1970 period are difficult to interpret as they may reflect the different source of data.”
On the comparative performance of socially responsible and Islamic mutual funds (2014, methodology): “…which combine DEA and the likes (such as FDH, order-m and order-α) with these more flexible methods, including Balaguer-Coll et al. (2007), in the case of nonparametric regression, Illueca et al. (2009), in the case of conditional density estimation and, to a lesser extent Kumar and Russell (2002).”
Estimation of growth convergence using a stochastic production frontier approach (2005, background): “In a seminal paper Kumar and Russell (2002) show that economic growth convergence can be viewed as countries’ movements toward the world production frontier.”
Monitoring bank performance in the presence of risk (2014, positive): “One example is found in Kumar and Russell (2002), who point out that the true but unobservable frontier should include the knowledge accumulated from previous periods.”
Some Remarks on Productivity and its Decompositions (2003, neutral): “20 This has been taken up by Kumar and Russell (2002) who”
Corporate Governance and Firm’s Efficiency: The Case of a Transitional Country, Ukraine (2006, background): “…best we could do however, which also conforms the standard empirical practice when researchers have to use aggregated (with prices) inputs and outputs in DEA formulation (for recent examples, see Färe et al. (1994a,b), Kumar and Russell (2002), Henderson and Russell (2004), to mention just a few).”