Estimation of growth convergence using a stochastic production frontier approach
By Subal C. Kumbhakar, Hung-Jen Wang. 2005
203 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/171f7b87accb34e13837f15da5b77d4f31fc147b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Robin C. Sickles
- Gudbrand Lien
- J. Brian Hardaker
- Karligash Kenjegalieva
- Anthony J. Glass
- Michael Danquah
- J. Amankwah‐Amoah
- Subal C. Kumbhakar
Citations in the corpus
- A spatial autoregressive stochastic frontier model for panel data with asymmetric efficiency spillovers (2015, methodology): “6As previously noted, we evaluate log jIN W j using a vector of values for , which LeSage and Pace (2009) refer to as the vectorized approach.”
- Handling Endogeneity in Stochastic Frontier Analysis (2015, unknown): “In the base scenario of their simulations, Kumbhakar and Wang (2005) pick � �⁄ = . and � + � = .”
- Assessing the relationships between human capital, innovation and technology adoption: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa (2017, background): “Explained in the context of production possibilities frontier, TFP growth can be decomposed into two mutually exclusive and exhaustive components; innovation (technical change) and adoption of technology (efficiency change) (see Färe et al., 1994; Lovell, 1996; Kumbhakar and Wang, 2005).”
- Technical efficiency in competing panel data models: a study of Norwegian grain farming (2014, methodology): “If all the -parameters are zero, then the model reduces to the one considered by Pitt and Lee (1981), Schmidt and Sickles (1984), Kumbhakar”