Funding Public Colleges and Universities for Performance: Popularity, Problems, and Prospects

By Joseph C. Burke. 2002

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Performance-Based Funding in American Higher Education: A Systematic Synthesis of the Intended and Unintended Consequences (2020, background): “The Intended Outcomes of PBF Adoption The policy goal associated with implementing PBF is to improve targeted institutional outcomes through the provision of material incentives (Burke, 2002; Dougherty & Reddy, 2013).”
The Impacts of State Performance Funding Systems on Higher Education Institutions: Research Literature Review and Policy Recommendations (2011, background): “…reporting or performance budgeting, performance funding uses a clearly specified formula to tie funding to institutional performance on indicators such as student retention, attainment of certain credit levels, and other student outcomes (Burke, 2002; Dougherty & Hong, 2006; Harnisch, 2011).”
Called to Account: Analyzing the Origins and Spread of State Performance-Accountability Policies for Higher Education (2006, background): “…education have expressed skepticism concerning a relationship between partisanship and the emergence of the new accountability policies (e.g., Burke, 2002), we believe a reasoned argument can be made that party control of government institutions may help explain the policy behaviors of…”