Perceptions about the local neighborhood and walking and cycling among children.

By A. Timperio, D. Crawford, A. Telford, J. Salmon. Preventive Medicine, 2004

825 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BACKGROUND This study examined associations between perceptions of the local neighborhood and walking and cycling among children. METHODS Children aged 5-6 years (n=291) and 10-12 years (n=919) were recruited from 19 Australian primary schools. Parents reported their child's usual walking or cycling to local destinations and their perceptions of their neighborhood. Ten- to twelve-year-olds were asked their perceptions of traffic, strangers, road safety and sporting venues, and their perceptions of their parent's views on these issues. RESULTS Five- to six-year-old boys whose parents believed there was heavy traffic in their area were 2.8 times more likely (95%CI=1.1-6.8), and 5- to 6-year-old girls whose parents owned more than one car were 70% less likely (95%CI=0.1-0.8), and whose parents believed that public transport was limited in their area were 60% less likely (95%CI=0.2-0.9) than other children to walk or cycle at least three times per week. Parental belief that there were no lights or crossings was associated with walking or cycling among 10- to 12-year-old boys (OR=0.4, 95%CI=0.2-0.7). Among older girls, parent's belief that their child needed to cross several roads to reach play areas (OR=0.4, 95%CI=0.2-0.8) and that there is limited public transport in their area (OR=0.7, 95%CI=0.4-0.97), and child's belief that there were no parks or sports grounds near home (OR=0.5, 95%CI=0.3-0.8) were associated with a lower likelihood of walking or cycling. CONCLUSION Perceptions of the local neighborhood may influence children's physical activity.

Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95f91fdf3f0572e8fe235e44c49ea15c1961b457

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

  1. G. McCormack
  2. Maria Giuseppina Pacilli
  3. A. Timperio
  4. Billie Giles-Corti
  5. Ann Forsyth
  6. Carolyn A. Millar
  7. Homan Lee
  8. J. Spence

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

  1. G. McCormack
  2. A. Timperio
  3. Billie Giles-Corti
  4. Ann Forsyth
  5. Maria Giuseppina Pacilli
  6. Maria Kamargianni
  7. Gina S. A. Trapp
  8. K. Krizek

In Transportation

  1. G. McCormack
  2. A. Timperio
  3. Ann Forsyth
  4. Maria Kamargianni
  5. Maria Giuseppina Pacilli
  6. Amalia Polydoropoulou
  7. Billie Giles-Corti
  8. B. Brown

Citations in the corpus