Cancer nanotechnology: the impact of passive and active targeting in the era of modern cancer biology.

By N. Bertrand, Jun Wu, Xiaoyang Xu, N. Kamaly, O. Farokhzad. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2014

2,587 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Cancer nanotherapeutics are progressing at a steady rate; research and development in the field has experienced an exponential growth since early 2000's. The path to the commercialization of oncology drugs is long and carries significant risk; however, there is considerable excitement that nanoparticle technologies may contribute to the success of cancer drug development. The pace at which pharmaceutical companies have formed partnerships to use proprietary nanoparticle technologies has considerably accelerated. It is now recognized that by enhancing the efficacy and/or tolerability of new drug candidates, nanotechnology can meaningfully contribute to create differentiated products and improve clinical outcome. This review describes the lessons learned since the commercialization of the first-generation nanomedicines including DOXIL® and Abraxane®. It explores our current understanding of targeted and non-targeted nanoparticles that are under various stages of development, including BIND-014 and MM-398. It highlights the opportunities and challenges faced by nanomedicines in contemporary oncology, where personalized medicine is increasingly the mainstay of cancer therapy. We revisit the fundamental concepts of enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR) and explore the mechanisms proposed to enhance preferential "retention" in the tumor, whether using active targeting of nanoparticles, binding of drugs to their tumoral targets or the presence of tumor associated macrophages. The overall objective of this review is to enhance our understanding in the design and development of therapeutic nanoparticles for treatment of cancers.

Subfields: Biomaterials, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95e3c5ed847c90663543e6c3f3b7a790f92c034f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomaterials

  1. N. Bertrand
  2. Xiaoyang Xu
  3. O. Farokhzad
  4. Xueqing Zhang

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. N. Bertrand
  2. Xiaoyang Xu
  3. O. Farokhzad
  4. Xueqing Zhang

In Molecular Biology

  1. N. Bertrand
  2. Xiaoyang Xu
  3. O. Farokhzad
  4. Xueqing Zhang

Citations in the corpus