Long-Term Assessment of the Effects of Transgenic Bt Cotton on the Function of the Natural Enemy Community
By S. Naranjo. 2005
108 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Insect Science, Molecular Biology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95b838e0937c36e8210095f31602f5c5693d29f6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Insect Science
In Molecular Biology
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Ecological compatibility of GM crops and biological control (2009, unknown): “Similarly, Sisterson et al. (2004) and Naranjo (2005b) noted that predation of several non-target prey species was comparable in Bt-and non-Bt cotton.”
- Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019, background): “The impact of Bt crops on the biological control services supplied by generalist arthropod predators have been uniformly neutral in Bt maize (Ahmad et al., 2006) and Bt cotton (Head et al., 2005; Naranjo, 2005b; Olson and Ruberson, 2012; Sisterson et al., 2004).”
- Sustainable pest management for cotton production. A review (2011, background): “…diversity of arthropod populations around cotton fields, which is weak but significant in certain cases, has encouraged the pursuit of investigations in this area of whole system impacts (Head et al., 2005; Naranjo, 2005a, b; Torres et al., 2005; Vaissayre et al., 2005; Whitehouse et al., 2005).”
- Impacts of Bt crops on non-target invertebrates and insecticide use patterns (2009, background): “Additional field life-table studies on another key cotton pest, Bemisia tabaci, demonstrated that marginal rates of both parasitism and predation on nymphs were equivalent in Bt and non-Bt cotton [81].”
- Long-Term Assessment of the Effects of Transgenic Bt Cotton on the Abundance of Nontarget Arthropod Natural Enemies (2005, background): “…densities of Þve natural enemy taxa in Bt cotton were detected in multi- year analyses, but a companion study measured similar levels of natural control by the natural enemy community in Bt and non-Bt cotton (Naranjo 2005), suggesting that these reductions may not be ecologically meaningful.”
- A Multiyear, Large-Scale Comparison of Arthropod Populations on Commercially Managed Bt and Non-Bt Cotton Fields (2005, background): “…of three U.S. states (north and south Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina) comparing arthropod populations on commercially managed Bt (Bollgard) and non-Bt (conventional) cotton (see also the papers in this volume by Naranjo 2005a, b, Torres and Ruberson 2005, Whitehouse et al. 2005).”
- Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and biological control (2006, background): “They did not differ between Bt and untreated non- Bt field”