Corporate social responsibility and innovation: a resource‐based theory
By Isabel Gallego‐Álvarez, José-Manuel Prado-Lorenzo, Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez. 2011
469 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95a9ba8b8005dcd6bb5914490678bb295aefa0cc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Are firms with different CSR profiles equally innovative? Empirical analysis with survey data (2013, methodology): “We also added two traditional controls, widely used in studies of CSR and innovation: the sector of activity (e.g. Gallego-Alvarez et al., 2011; Husted & Allen, 2007; Wagner, 2010) (manufacturing/services, INDUS) and a variable indicating whether the firm belongs to a group (GROUP).”
- CSR, Innovation, and Firm Performance in Sluggish Growth Contexts: A Firm-Level Empirical Analysis (2015, background): “In addition, studies of CSR and innovation often include the sector of activity (e.g., Gallego-Alvarez et al. 2011).”
- Crowdfunding social ventures: a model and research agenda (2013, unknown): “Instead of focusing on financial returns on investments, for example entrepreneurs have to participate with their social ideas in competitions organized by foundations such as Skoll or Ashoka, or increasingly by traditional for-profit companies as part of their CSR activities (Baron 2007; Cornelius ”
- Corporate social responsibility and innovative capacity: Intersection in a macro-level perspective (2018, unknown): “In this context, empirical evidence linking country-level innovative capacity to CSR is still sparse (Gallego-Alvarez et al., 2011; Luo and Du, 2015; Shen et al., 2016) with the academic debate on interrelationships between the two constructs to be mostly how the innovative potential among…”