The genomic landscape of species divergence in Ficedula flycatchers

By H. Ellegren, Linnéa Smeds, R. Burri, Pall I. Olason, N. Backström, T. Kawakami, Axel Künstner, H. Mäkinen, K. Nadachowska-Brzyska, A. Qvarnström and 2 more. Nature, 2012

654 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Unravelling the genomic landscape of divergence between lineages is key to understanding speciation. The naturally hybridizing collared flycatcher and pied flycatcher are important avian speciation models that show pre- as well as postzygotic isolation. We sequenced and assembled the 1.1-Gb flycatcher genome, physically mapped the assembly to chromosomes using a low-density linkage map and re-sequenced population samples of each species. Here we show that the genomic landscape of species differentiation is highly heterogeneous with approximately 50 ‘divergence islands’ showing up to 50-fold higher sequence divergence than the genomic background. These non-randomly distributed islands, with between one and three regions of elevated divergence per chromosome irrespective of chromosome size, are characterized by reduced levels of nucleotide diversity, skewed allele-frequency spectra, elevated levels of linkage disequilibrium and reduced proportions of shared polymorphisms in both species, indicative of parallel episodes of selection. Proximity of divergence peaks to genomic regions resistant to sequence assembly, potentially including centromeres and telomeres, indicate that complex repeat structures may drive species divergence. A much higher background level of species divergence of the Z chromosome, and a lower proportion of shared polymorphisms, indicate that sex chromosomes and autosomes are at different stages of speciation. This study provides a roadmap to the emerging field of speciation genomics.

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/959af499f4989d8a0647a9616ac39119c7c02815

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. James Mallet
  2. Chris D. Jiggins
  3. C. Sgrò
  4. Matthew W. Hahn
  5. Tami E. Cruickshank
  6. Harry Guy Hornsby
  7. C. Ryan Campbell
  8. M. Byrne

In Molecular Biology

  1. Tami E. Cruickshank
  2. Harry Guy Hornsby
  3. C. Ryan Campbell
  4. M. Byrne
  5. James R. Walters
  6. C. Salazar
  7. A. Hoffmann
  8. M. Chapman

In Plant Science

  1. Chris D. Jiggins
  2. Harry Guy Hornsby
  3. C. Ryan Campbell
  4. M. Byrne
  5. A. Hoffmann
  6. M. Chapman
  7. M. Rius
  8. L. Joseph

Citations in the corpus