Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

By Edward K. Vogel, Geoffrey F. Woodman, Steven J. Luck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2001

1,214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/958850c7e7ef55ec2fa94580c18a404b240269ed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Human-Computer Interaction

Citations in the corpus

Voluntary and automatic attentional control of visual working memory (2002, result): “Contrary evidencewas provided,however, by Woodman, Vogel, and Luck (2001), who found that subjects could conduct an attention-demanding visual search task just as easily when working memory was filled by a secondary task as they could when working memory was not filled.”
Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention. (2006, neutral): “Vogel, Woodman, and Luck (2001) estimated that visual working memory capacity is sufficient to hold about four features.”
The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource (2009, methodology): “While previous studies have observed no advantage of increasing array duration above 100 ms for unmasked displays (Luck & Vogel, 1997; Vogel et al., 2001), these tests were based on detection of supra-threshold changes in color and were therefore insensitive to the precision with which items were st”
Cross-modal binding and working memory (2009, methodology): “Using a more direct test of binding memory than those implemented by Vogel et al. (2001), Wheeler and Treisman (2002) observed that accuracy for feature combinations was equivalent to single feature conditions only when a single test probe was used.”
Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations (2003, background): “It is important to note that in our experiment the number of objects and features fell within the limits of WM capacity (c.f. Wheeler & Treisman, 2002; Vogel et al., 2001; Luck & Vogel, 1997).”
Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. (2006, neutral): “(Similar ideas have also been proposed by Davis and Holmes (2005), and entertained by Magnussen et al. (1998) and by Vogel et al. (2001).)”
The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects (2004, background): “Recent research (Luck & Vogel, 1997; Vogel, Woodman, & Luck, 2001 ) has shown that visual short-term memory appears to be limited by the number of objects that can be stored, independently of the number of features probed for each object.”
Visual working memory for simple and complex visual stimuli (2005, neutral): “Other aspects of Experiment 1B were identical to those in Experiment 1A. Experiment 1C: Concurrent Verbal Working Memory Load To minimize the contribution of verbal working memory, on each trial of the change detection task, a concurrent verbal load was employed (Vogel et al., 2001).”
One, two, three, four, nothing more: an investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles. (2007, neutral): “obtained here, namely error increasing more rapidly than the mean (see Vogel et al., 2001 ).”