Voluntary and automatic attentional control of visual working memory
By B. Schmidt, Edward K. Vogel, Geoffrey F. Woodman, Steven J. Luck. 2002
297 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90ee3f927451d4a2de2ffe33ea10c124294bad15
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Shaun Vecera
- M. Matsukura
- Steven J. Luck
- A. Hollingworth
- Anna Christina Nobre
- Ivan C. Griffin
- Klaus Oberauer
- Tim J. Smith
Citations in the corpus
- Attention effects during visual short-term memory maintenance: Protection or prioritization? (2007, background): “Under such conditions, Schmidt et al. (2002) found a cuing effect with a cue that appeared immediately after the offset of the memory array.”
- Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations (2003, background): “In a recent study, Schmidt et al. (2002, Experiment 4) presented nonpredictive peripheral cues immediately after stimulus array offset, and found memory for subsequent probe stimuli presented at the cued location to be better than memory for stimuli at uncued locations.”
- Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention. (2006, unknown): “In the present experiments there were some hints of the singleton distractor influencing memory performance (notably in Experiment 4; see also Schmidt, Vogel, Woodman, & Luck, 2002).”
- Visual memory for natural scenes: Evidence from change detection and visual search (2006, background): “However, directing attention to an object allows the formation of a coherent visual representation (Treisman, 1988) and the consolidation of that representation into more stable VSTM (Averbach & Coriell, 1961; Irwin, 1992a; Schmidt, Vogel, Woodman, & Luck, 2002; Sperling, 1960), which maintains vi”