Simulation of the Madden–Julian Oscillation in a Coupled General Circulation Model. Part I: Comparison with Observations and an Atmosphere-Only GCM
210 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/957d1b3b827cb56f98840ff4066a704b7ad73073
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Global and Planetary Change
In Oceanography
Citations in the corpus
- Surface Fluxes and Tropical Intraseasonal Variability: a Reassessment (2008, background): “The real MJO is not a pure Kelvin wave (though it retains aspects of Kelvin wave dynamics), and the basic state surface winds in regions of strong tropical intraseasonal variability are westerly (e.g. Inness and Slingo 2003; Maloney and Esbensen 2007).”
- Tropical Intraseasonal Variability in 14 IPCC AR4 Climate Models. Part I: Convective Signals (2006, background): “Coupling to the ocean has been found by many studies to improve the MJO signals (e.g., Flatau et al. 1997; Waliser et al. 1999; Sperber et al. 2005), although changes in a model’s mean state need to be taken into account (e.g., Hendon 2000; Inness and Slingo 2003; Sperber et al. 2005).”
- An Idealized Semi-Empirical Framework for Modeling the Madden–Julian Oscillation (2012, background): “…of GCM studies indicate that while ocean coupling may improve the simulation of the MJO, it is not essential to the existence of the MJO (Waliser et al. 1999; Hendon 2000; Kemball-Cook et al. 2002; Inness and Slingo 2003; Zheng et al. 2004; Maloney and Sobel 2004; Grabowski 2006; Fu et al. 2007).”
- The effect of volcanic eruptions on global precipitation (2013, result): “This monsoon response and seasonal shift agree with the model results of Joseph and Zeng [2011]. The main features of the response persist until year 3 or 4 although details of the response vary from year to year.”
- Simulations of the Madden–Julian oscillation in four pairs of coupled and uncoupled global models (2006, background): “Likewise, evidence supporting the importance of air–sea coupling from fully coupled atmosphere and ocean GCMs (e.g., Kemball-Cook et al. 2002; Inness and Slingo 2003 ) should be validated using fully coupled GCMs (e.g., Hendon 2000; Liess et al 2004; Sperber et al. 2005).”
- Atmosphere‐ocean coupled processes in the Madden‐Julian oscillation (2015, background): “AIR-SEA COUPLING AND THE MJO 1110 Woolnough et al., 2000; Inness and Slingo, 2003; Duvel and Vialard, 2007].”
- Intraseasonal Variability in an Aquaplanet General Circulation Model (2010, result): “…SST produces only weak eastward-propagating intraseasonal variability on 30–90 day timescales, consistent with previous studies suggesting that a westerly low-level basic state is necessary for producing realistic intraseasonal variability (e.g. Inness and Slingo 2003; Inness et al. 2003).”
- Primary and successive events in the Madden–Julian Oscillation (2008, background): “Coupling of atmosphere and ocean models has generally lead to improved and more coherent simulations of the MJO (Sperber et al., 1997; Waliser et al., 1999; Inness and Slingo, 2003), provided that the basic climatology of the model was sufficiently accurate (Hendon, 2000).”