Types and tokens in visual letter perception.

By Michael C. Mozer. 1989

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Sjoerd van Steenkiste
2. Klaus Greff
3. J. Urgen Schmidhuber
4. Yoshua Bengio
5. Sergey Levine
6. Anirudh Goyal
7. Antonio Torralba
8. Quoc V. Le

Citations in the corpus

• On the Binding Problem in Artificial Neural Networks (2020, background): “There is some evidence that humans struggle with feature overlap too and show reduced working memory capacity in these cases (Mozer, 1989).”
• The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information. (1992, background): “Interestingly, it appears that the coding of repeated instances may fail with brief presentations or at high rates of sequential presentation, leading to “repetition blindness” (Kanwisher, 1987; Mozer, 1989).”
• A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order (2010, background): “Locating a missing or additional repeated tokens is notoriously difficult – as attested by the well-known “Paris in the the spring” example (see Mozer, 1989), and the repetition blindness phenomenon (Kanwisher, 1987).”