Changes in Column Ozone Correlated with the Stratospheric EP Flux

By William J. Randel, Fei Wu, R. Stolarski. 2002

221 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/955556d4a3ea4f5cfa4ff296c28ecdaa0de34549

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. T. G. Shepherd
2. L. Polvani
3. D. Waugh
4. P. Newman
5. E. Nash
6. D. Wuebbles
7. T. Birner
8. A. Butler

In Global and Planetary Change

1. T. G. Shepherd
2. L. Polvani
3. D. Waugh
4. P. Newman
5. E. Nash
6. D. Wuebbles
7. T. Birner
8. A. Butler

Citations in the corpus

• Upward Wave Activity Flux as a Precursor to Extreme Stratospheric Events and Subsequent Anomalous Surface Weather Regimes (2004, result): “We average the heat flux between 458 and 758N to be consistent with several previous studies that have considered this same quantity when examining interannual variations in stratospheric wave forcing (e.g., Waugh et al. 1999; Newman et al. 2001; Randel et al. 2002).”
• Dynamics, stratospheric ozone, and climate change (2008, background): “Interannual variations in stratospheric planetary-wave drag are observed to affect ozone in the expected way; more wave drag implies a stronger Brewer-Dobson circulation and hence a stronger build-up of extratropical ozone in the winter-spring period (Fusco and Salby, 1999; Randel et al., 2002).”
• The Unusual Southern Hemisphere Stratosphere Winter of 2002 (2005, background): “Northern Hemisphere (NH) flux values from a variety of analyses show differences of 15% (Newman and Nash 2000), while a comparison of the SH heat flux between the NNR and European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts analyses by Randel et al. (2002) shows large differences.”
• Transport in the Middle Atmosphere (2007, background): “However the amplitude (and to a lesser extent the shape) of the seasonal cycle varies from year to year, as the wave forcing varies (Fusco and Salby 1999; Randel et al. 2002).”
• Trend analysis of total ozone data for turnaround and dynamical contributions (2005, methodology): “... is of the form g3,0Z3,t + g3,1Z3,t� 1 + g3,2Z3,t� 2. [13] Similarly, we include the lower stratosphere EP flux series, Z4,t, in the model with time lags, so that the general term in the statistical model is of the form g4,0Z4,t + g4,1Z4,t� 1 + g4,2Z4,t� 2. The EP flux dynamical time series are c”