Currency unions and trade: The special case of EMU

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Trade Potentials in Gravity Panel Data Models (2005, unknown): “…‘persistence effect’, quite a few studies based on a panel estimation of gravity equations have considered the possibility of controlling for them through a dynamic specification of the regression (Egger, 2001; De Grauwe and Skudelny, 2000; Bun and Klaassen, 2002; de Nardis and Vicarelli, 2003).”
Zooming Out: The Trade Effect of the Euro in Historical Perspective (2008, background): “Other papers, including Baldwin, Skudelny, and Taglioni (2005), Barr, Breedon, and Miles (2003), Bun and Klaassen (2002), De Nardis and Vicarelli (2003), De Sousa and Lochard (2004), Faruqee (2004), and Flam and Nordström (2003), report broadly similar, and often even larger, estimates.”
Gravity models in integrated panels (2009, methodology): “Bun and Klaassen 2002; de Nardis and Vicarelli 2003) estimate dynamic panel models to account for trade persistence.”
Trade effects of monetary agreements: Evidence for OECD countries (2008, background): “2 Specifically, the effect of the euro on trade has been analysed in several papers (see, Rose and van Wincoop, 2001; Bun and Klaassen, 2002; Micco, Stein and Ordoñez, 2003; De Nardis and Vicarelli, 2003; Faruqee, 2004; Baldwin, Skudelny, and Taglioni 2005).”
Does Turkey have a special trade relation with the EU (2006, unknown): “Equation (1) does not consider an important modelling aspect of trade, namely dynamics (see de Nardis and Vicarelli, 2003).”