Trade Potentials in Gravity Panel Data Models

By Luca De Benedictis, Claudio Vicarelli. 2005

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df2bf46aa2de690c835ce93985bd529280f3dd17

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Estrella Gomez-Herrera
2. J. Fidrmuc
3. Robert J. Richmond

Citations in the corpus

• Comparing alternative methods to estimate gravity models of bilateral trade (2010, background): “Schiavo (2007) and Martin and Pham (2008) Panel fixed effects Simple Loss of information (constant terms in the regression are dropped) Mátyás (1998), Egger (2000), Glick and Rose (2002), Egger and Pfaffermayr (2003), Micco et al. (2003), Andrews et al.”
• Gravity models in integrated panels (2009, background): “Therefore, De Benedictis and Vicarelli (2005) recommend the system GMM estimator according to Blundell and Bond (1998).”
• Panel Data Gravity Models of International Trade (2014, unknown): “An old interest in estimating gravity models relates to the issue of so-called trade (or foreign direct investment) potentials (see Baldwin, 1993, 1994; Gros and Gonciarz, 1996; Brenton and DiMauro, 1998; Nilsson, 2000; De Benedictis and Vicarelli, 2005).”