The HILDA Survey: a case study in the design and development of a successful household panel study

394 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Demonstration of Set-Points for Subjective Wellbeing (2014, background): “Annual re-interview rates are high, rising from 87% in wave 2 to over 96% by wave 9 (Watson & Wooden, 2012).”
Estimating the cost of air pollution in South East Queensland: An application of the life satisfaction non-market valuation approach (2013, background): “See Watson and Wooden (2012) for a recent review of progress and future developments of the HILDA survey.”
Dispositional Positive and Negative Affect and Self-Employment Transitions: The Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction (2019, background): “The annual retention rates are consistently high, with the proportion of individuals who were successfully re-interview from one wave to the next varying from 87% to 97% (Watson & Wooden, 2012).”
Mental Health and Productivity at Work: Does What You Do Matter? (2017, methodology): “…analysis uses data from the first 14 waves of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey, a panel survey that has been collecting data on an annual basis since 2001 from members of a nationally representative sample of Australian households (see Watson and Wooden 2012).”