Government policy and technological innovation—a suggested typology

By Wilfred Dolfsma, D. Seo. 2013

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/94756dd8069546ea46b43a3143d9f204e233bde3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Ross Brown
2. Colin Mason
3. Shuaihe Zhuo
4. T. Konc
5. Ivan Savin
6. J. Bergh
7. Zefu Wu
8. Joël Foramitti

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Ross Brown
2. Colin Mason
3. Shuaihe Zhuo
4. J. Bergh
5. Zefu Wu
6. Jie Wu
7. Neil Chueh-An Lee

In Strategy and Management

1. Shuaihe Zhuo
2. Colin Mason
3. J. Bergh
4. Zefu Wu
5. Jie Wu
6. Ross Brown

Citations in the corpus

• Inside the high-tech black box: A critique of technology entrepreneurship policy (2014, background): “In recent years, both the OECD and the European Union have strongly endorsed the view that innovation is a key driver of economic growth (European Commission, 2010; OECD, 2010a; Flanagan et al., 2011; Dolfsma and Seo, 2013; Cox and Rigby, 2013; Mazzucato, 2013).”
• Designing an effective climate-policy mix: accounting for instrument synergy (2021, background): “Many other instruments fall into this broad category (Dolfsma and Dongback, 2013): e.”
• National innovation system, social entrepreneurship, and rural economic growth in China (2017, background): “…and regional innovation systems (RIS) (Braczyk et al., 1998; Cantner et al., 2010; Chung, 2002; Kramer et al., 2011), sectoral innovation systems (Dolfsma and Seo, 2013; Kirchhoff, 1989; Malerba, 2002), technological road mapping (Carvalho et al., 2013; Linton and Walsh, 2004; Walsh, 2004), and…”