Dynamic inconsistency and self-control: a planner-doer interpretation

By Roland Bénabou, Marek Pycia. 2002

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9445752906d0f4dace3e235b27b3ac060ec7a7d3

Citations in the corpus

• The Philosophy of Economics: Neuroeconomics: Using Neuroscience to Make Economic Predictions (2007, unknown): “It remains to be seen whether neural measurement will be useful for 1 Benabou and Pyciak (2002) show how the Gul and Pesendorfer (2001) model of preferences under temptation is mathematically equivalent to a rent-seeking competition between two brain areas, linking the preferential approach to the…”
• Animal Spirits: Affective and Deliberative Processes in Economic Behavior (2004, unknown): “…∈ [0,1] of how much the affective system will influence future decisions, and so the deliberative system predicts that period-2 behavior will maximize V̂~ 2(x1,x2) = z2(x1,x2) + [1/(1+ γ̂ h)]* z3(x1,x2) 16 Bénabou and Pycia (2002) provide a similar reinterpretation of the Gul and Pesendorfer model.”