Animal Spirits: Affective and Deliberative Processes in Economic Behavior

419 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: a theoretical framework and empirical review (2008, background): “In contrast, the present framework is based on the assumption of an operational asymmetry between the impulsive processes that are assumed to underlie short-term hedonic behaviors on the one hand and the higher-order, capacity-consuming processes of reasoned action and long-term goal pursuit on th”
Multiple Systems for Value Learning (2014, background): “Similar frameworks have also become prevalent in neuroscience and behavioral economics (Balleine and Dickinson 1998; Balleine et al., 2008; Daw et al., 2005; Kahneman, 2003; Laibson, 1997; Loewenstein and O’Donoghue, 2004; Thaler and An, 1981; Weber and Johnson, 2009).”
Modeling the interplay between affect and deliberation. (2015, background): “Economists, too, have developed dual-process models of human behavior along these lines (Benhabib & Bisin, 2005; Bernheim & Rangel, 2004; Fudenberg & Levine, 2006; Shefrin & Thaler, 1988; Thaler & Shefrin, 1981; and an earlier version of the current article, Loewenstein & O'Donoghue, 2004).”