Phylogenetics and character evolution in the grass family (Poaceae): Simultaneous analysis of morphological and Chloroplast DNA restriction site character sets

By R. Soreng, Jerrold I. Davis. The Botanical review, 2008

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/942f5f33c85421b005369f415da18086b02c8bd0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Assembling the Tree of the Monocotyledons: Plastome Sequence Phylogeny and Evolution of Poales1 (2010, background): “Long-branched or plumose stigmas (sensu Heslop-Harrison & Shivanna, 1977; Dahlgren et al., 1985; Soreng & Davis, 1998) were taken as one line of evidence for wind pollination and consequently not scored separately as a character that might show correlated evolution with wind pollination.”
Systematics and evolution of the needle grasses (Poaceae: Pooideae: Stipeae) based on analysis of multiple chloroplast loci, ITS, and lemma micromorphology (2012, background): “…different from Stipeae s.str. in gross morphology of the spikelet, but similar in anatomy and cytology to members of this tribe (Decker, 1964), appears from molecular data to be nested in Stipeae (Davis & Soreng, 2007, 2010; Hsiao & al., 1999; Romaschenko & al., 2008, 2010; Soreng & Davis, 1998).”
Why are small seeds dispersed through animal guts: large numbers or seed size per se? (2006, methodology): “Sources used for phylogenetic supertree (Sanderson et al. 1998): the Angiosperm phylogeny of Davies et al. (2004) was used as a backbone; Eldena ¨s et al. (1999) and Bayer and Starr (1998) for Asteraceae, Olmstead et al. (2001) and Albach et al. (2004) for Lamiales, Zunk et al. (1999) and Koch et al”
The Epichloae, Symbionts of the Grass Subfamily Poöideae1 (2010, background): “Recently, this family has been reassessed based on multiple gene sequences, erecting the families Cordycipitaceae and Ophiocordycipitaceae (Sung et al., 2007), both of which are mainly insect parasites.”