THE GALAXY LUMINOSITY FUNCTION DURING THE REIONIZATION EPOCH

By M. Trenti, M. Stiavelli, R. Bouwens, P. Oesch, J. Michael Shull, G. Illingworth, L. Bradley, C. Carollo. 2010

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The new Wide Field Camera 3/IR observations on the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field (HUDF) started investigating the properties of galaxies during the reionization epoch. To interpret these observations, we present a novel approach inspired by the conditional luminosity function method. We calibrate our model to observations at z = 6 and assume a non-evolving galaxy luminosity versus halo mass relation. We first compare model predictions against the luminosity function (LF) measured at z = 5 and z = 4. We then predict the LF at z ⩾ 7 under the sole assumption of evolution in the underlying dark-matter halo mass function. Our model is consistent with the observed z ≳ 7 galaxy number counts in the HUDF survey and suggests a possible steepening of the faint-end slope of the LF: α(z ≳ 8) ≲ −1.9 compared to α = −1.74 at z = 6. Although we currently see only the brightest galaxies, a hidden population of lower luminosity objects (L/L* ≳ 10−4) might provide ≳75% of the total reionizing flux. Assuming escape fraction fesc ∼ 0.2, clumping factor C ∼ 5, top-heavy initial mass function (IMF), and low metallicity, galaxies below the detection limit produce complete reionization at z ≳ 8. For solar metallicity and normal stellar IMF, reionization finishes at z ≳ 6, but a smaller C/fesc is required for an optical depth consistent with the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe measurement. Our model highlights that the star formation rate in sub-L* galaxies has a quasi-linear relation to dark-matter halo mass, suggesting that radiative and mechanical feedback were less effective at z ⩾ 6 than today.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/94172d4e626a70f2a8415f6770e7f9c5c7104279

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Richard S. Ellis
  2. R. Bouwens
  3. P. Oesch
  4. G. Illingworth
  5. J. Dunlop
  6. M. Franx
  7. P. V. van Dokkum
  8. I. Labbé

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Richard S. Ellis
  2. R. Bouwens
  3. J. Dunlop
  4. P. Oesch
  5. D. Stark
  6. G. Illingworth
  7. R. McLure
  8. I. Labbé

In Instrumentation

  1. Richard S. Ellis
  2. R. Bouwens
  3. P. Oesch
  4. G. Illingworth
  5. M. Franx
  6. P. V. van Dokkum
  7. I. Labbé
  8. J. Dunlop

Citations in the corpus