The grounded theory perspective Theoretical coding.

By B. Glaser, Ca Valley. 2005

398 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Guiding the use of Grounded Theory in Doctoral studies – an example from the Australian film industry (2011, methodology): “(p. 11)”
How Data Science Workers Work with Data: Discovery, Capture, Curation, Design, Creation (2019, methodology): “To organize our analysis, we used two sets of sensitizing concepts [11], [12], [34], [79].”
Choosing a Methodological Path: Reflections on the Constructivist Turn (2012, methodology): “Constructivist grounded theory was proffered by Charmaz (2003, 2006) as an alternative to classic (Glaser 1978, 1992, 1998, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2011) and straussian grounded theory (Strauss & Corbin 1990, 1998).”
Teacher collaboration for change: sharing, improving, and spreading (2020, background): “In Figure 1, the author referred to the family coding ‘process’ suggested by Glaser (1978, 2005).”
Self-Organizing Roles on Agile Software Development Teams (2013, background): “In contrast, theoretical codes “implicitly conceptualize how the substantive codes will relate to each other as a modeled, interrelated, multivariate set of hypothesis in accounting for resolving the main concern” [96].”
A Personal Experience of Working with Classical Grounded Theory: From Beginner to Experienced Grounded Theorist (2007, methodology): “They are not necessary, but a GT becomes more integrated and relevant when theoretical coding is used because it raises the theory to a higher level (Glaser, 2005).”