Validity Arguments for High‐stakes Testing: In Search of the Evidence

By Edward H. Haertel. 2005

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93ed6e830d884c96c60db9a5d4056fd7439fa936

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Lyle F. Bachman

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Lyle F. Bachman

In Statistics and Probability

1. L. Wang
2. Lyle F. Bachman

Citations in the corpus

• Building and Supporting a Case for Test Use (2005, background): “A number of researchers (e.g., Haertel, 1999; Kane, 2001) have pointed out that the demandsofastrongprogramofvalidation,basedonexplicitlystatedhypothesesand assumptions, can be quite heavy, both in terms of the theoretical base needed and the resources required.”
• Controversies of Standardized Assessment in School Accountability Reform: A Critical Synthesis of Multidisciplinary Research Evidence (2006, background): “Even if reform is justified, some opponents of assessment-driven reform see the logic of using assessment as the lever to effect change as fundamentally deficient (Haertel, 1999).”