Apples, Oranges, and Probabilities: Integrating Multiple Factors into Biodiversity Conservation with Consistency

By P. Williams, Miguel B. Araújo. 2002

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93e023262a5b6b5ff890a14e4ee4e5846e9edd68

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Identifying spatial components of ecological and evolutionary processes for regional conservation planning in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa (2003, background): “Variations on this theme include targeting species where persistence is more likely (Williams & Araújo, 2002).”
Uses and requirements of ecological niche models and related distributional models (2006, background): “…et al. 2002) and identifying optimal dispersal corridor locations (Williams et al. 2005); indeed now these place-prioritization algorithms are able to base analyses on probability data (rather than just presence-absence data) (Araújo and Williams 2000; Cabeza et al. 2004; Williams and Araújo 2002).”
An evaluation of methods for modelling species distributions (2004, unknown): “…networks, Portugal, spatial interpolators. ª 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd www.blackwellpublishing.com/jbi 1555 been increasingly advocated (e.g. Margules & Nicholls, 1987; Cocks & Baird, 1989; Araújo & Williams, 2000; Williams & Araújo, 2000, 2002; Polasky & Solow, 2001; Araújo et al., 2004).”
Synthesis of pattern and process in biodiversity conservation assessment: a flexible whole‐landscape modelling framework (2010, background): “Furthermore, combining targets relating to processes with more traditional pattern-representation targets can be rather like ‘mixing apples and oranges’ (Williams & Araújo, 2002).”
Connectivity, Probabilities and Persistence: Comparing Reserve Selection Strategies (2006, background): “One alternative to presence–absence data are probabilities of occurrence (Austin et al. 1984; Margules and Stein 1989; Williams and Araújo 2002; Cabeza 2003; Cabeza et al. 2004a).”
Conservation Biogeography: assessment and prospect (2005, methodology): “In this way, the approach combines both compositionalist and functionalist perspectives (as Callicott et al., 1999; Williams & Araújo, 2000, 2002).”
A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape (2010, background): “This might be problematic and subjective, potentially leading to some arbitrary decisions on these weights in the final conservation plan (McDonnell et al. 2002, Williams and Araújo 2002, Cabeza 2003, Nicholson et al. 2006).”
Conservation biogeography – foundations, concepts and challenges (2010, background): “However, in our view, biogeography is well poised to make a significant contribution in the coming years to the process of providing policy makers with alternative scenarios addressing differing end goals (cf. Williams & Araújo, 2002; Dimitrakopoulos et al., 2004).”
Extinction risk in cloud forest fragments under climate change and habitat loss (2013, background): “…change, makes it imperative to include explicit measures of persistence, such as the risk of extinction (Hof & Raphael, 1993; Bevers et al., 1995; Williams & Araujo, 2002; Nicholson & Possingham, 2006), not just implicit measures DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12064 518…”