Normalisation affects the results of MADM methods

By D. Pavličić. 2001

69 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93d0b4ada10c9faf657f5d7339568829f30f9e5b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng
2. Serafim Opricovic
3. Z. Markovic
4. Zeshui Xu
5. Huchang Liao
6. Hung-Yi Wu
7. Yu-Ping Ou Yang
8. Zhongliang Yue

Citations in the corpus

• Modification of TOPSIS method for solving of multicriteria tasks (2010, methodology): “It could prove that alternative ranks may differ if different scales for quantification of two independent qualitative criteria are used [6].”
• Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS (2004, methodology): “Does evaluation of the ith criterion function as fi or /i affect the result of MCDM method? The answer should be NO, although there are normalization procedures with effects on the final MCDM result (Pavlicic, 2001).”