The Illusion of Welfare ‘Regimes’

By G. Kasza. Journal of Social Policy, 2002

253 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93a71c6464c709eb3541cc08cfad1b14f4c885fd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

1. Anne West
2. Rita Nikolai
3. C. Jensen
4. H. Fenger
5. C. Bambra
6. A. Barrientos
7. M. Powell

In General Health Professions

1. C. Jensen
2. H. Fenger
3. Anne West
4. Rita Nikolai
5. C. Bambra
6. A. Barrientos
7. M. Powell

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Anne West
2. Rita Nikolai
3. C. Jensen
4. H. Fenger
5. C. Bambra
6. A. Barrientos
7. M. Powell

Citations in the corpus

• Research Note: Decommodification and the worlds of welfare revisited (2006, background): “…(see e.g. Lewis, 1992; Orloff, 1993; Sainsbury, 1994; 1999; Bambra, 2004), the analytical focus on cash benefits (Abrahamson, 1999; Kautto, 2002; Bambra, 2005a; 2005b) and the creation of regimes that generalize about all forms of social-policy provision from this base (Kasza, 2002; Bambra, 2005a).”
• Welfare Regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating Post-Communist Countries in a Welfare Regime Typology (2006, background): “Even the fiercest criticists of the welfare typology approach cannot ignore his seminal work (Kasza 2002).”
• Cash Versus Services: ‘Worlds of Welfare’ and the Decommodification of Cash Benefits and Health Care Services (2005, unknown): “…histories of different policy areas, the variation of policy actors across different fields, differences in the policy-making process and the influence on policy of foreign welfare models – all undermine the likelihood of a coherent approach to welfare provision within a country (Kasza, 2002).”
• Worlds of welfare services and transfers (2008, background): “2 Some have even argued that no welfare regimes can be said to exist at all (Kasza, 2002; Scruggs and Allan, 2006), although such opinions are a clear minority.”
• The worlds of welfare: illusory and gender blind? (2004, background): “The i l l u s i on o f we l f a r e s t a t e r e g imes Similarly, Kasza (2002) has also questioned the validity of the regimes concept.”
• Defamilisation and welfare state regimes: a cluster analysis (2007, background): “These variations across different policy areas have led to the questioning of the entire concept of welfare state regimes and the possibility of accurate welfare state typologies (Kasza, 2002).”
• Welfare Regimes and Education Regimes: Equality of Opportunity and Expenditure in the EU (and US) (2013, background): “In a similar vein, Kasza (2002), arguing that the concept of ‘welfare regime’ exaggerates the internal consistency of national welfare systems, proposed that comparative research might instead focus on particular policy areas. welfare regimes and education regimes 475 Two specific policy areas,…”