The worlds of welfare: illusory and gender blind?

By C. Bambra. Social Policy and Society, 2004

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c1bf03325a8c4fc3d5241ea0ed60f9d776040ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. C. Bambra
2. A. Barrientos
3. M. Powell

In Political Science and International Relations

1. C. Bambra
2. A. Barrientos
3. M. Powell

In Public Administration

1. C. Bambra
2. A. Barrientos
3. M. Powell

Citations in the corpus

• Defamilisation and welfare state regimes: a cluster analysis (2007, methodology): “It should be noted that the first measure, relative economic activity rate, differs only slightly from the relative labour market participation rate used in the earlier analysis (Bambra, 2004).”
• Cash Versus Services: ‘Worlds of Welfare’ and the Decommodification of Cash Benefits and Health Care Services (2005, unknown): “…level within a health care system (3) The percentage of the population covered by the health care system – this shows the extent of general access provided by the public health care system Source: Based on Bambra, 2005. unemployment and sickness (see Table 2) (Esping-Andersen, 1990; Bambra, 2004b).”
• Research Note: Decommodification and the worlds of welfare revisited (2006, methodology): “This debate has largely focused on the theoretical aspects of the analysis as numerous critiques exist about the range of countries and regimes (see for example, Leibfreid, 1992; Castles and Mitchell, 1993; Ferrera, 1996; Bonoli, 1997); the absence of gender in the typology (see e.g. Lewis, 1992; Or”