Comparison of 2D finite element modeling assumptions with results from 3D analysis for composite skin-stiffener debonding

By Ronald Krueger, I. Paris, T. O'Brien, Pierre J. A. Minguet. 2002

70 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Polymers and Plastics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/937000c9205a0b7b97739e25d26374749a68b221

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Mechanics of Materials

1. De Xie
2. Anthony M. Waas

Citations in the corpus

• Strain energy release rate calculation for a moving delamination front of arbitrary shape based on the virtual crack closure technique. Part I: Formulation and validation (2006, background): “Krueger et al. [ 20 ] pointed out the necessity to perform full 3D analysis in their examples.”
• Progressive crack growth analysis using interface element based on the virtual crack closure technique (2006, background): “Some applications of VCCT include the delamination of composites [27–30], the debonding of skin-stiffeners [25,26, 31 ], and the failure of adhesively bonded joints [32,33].”